Grievance Officer

  • Home
  • About Us
  • IT Law
  • Grievance Officers
  • Contact Us
You are here: Home / Amitabh Thakur V Union Of India

Airtel to compensate Rs 15,000 for disrupting service

August 31, 2012 By Legal Solutions

A consumer court at Delhi ordered Telecom operator Airtel to compensate Rs 15,000 to subscriber for harassment caused by disconnecting his mobile services for 24 days. Both incoming and outgoing calls on the said Airtel number were disconnected of … [Continue reading]

Filed Under: Airtel, Consumer Courts, Court Judgments

Nokia to pay Rs 67,000 for selling Defective Cell Phones

August 30, 2012 By Legal Solutions

Nokia has been directed by a District Consumer Forum to compensate Rs 67,000 to a customers for harrassing him by selling a defective" cell phone and then failing to repair it or refund its price. The South Delhi District Consumer Disputes Redressal … [Continue reading]

Filed Under: Consumer Courts, Court Judgments

Maruti to pay Rs One Lakh for wrong fuel efficiency claim

August 23, 2012 By Legal Solutions

In another decision by the New Delhi Consumer Court, Maruti has been slapped with a fine of Rs one lakh. for false claims as to fuel efficiency of Zen Card Model through advertisements in 2004. The consumer alleged that Maruti in its advertisement in … [Continue reading]

Filed Under: Consumer Courts, Court Judgments

HDFC Bank fined Rs 1 lakh for raising wrong credit card bill

August 21, 2012 By Legal Solutions

The HDFC Bank has been asked by a district consumer forum here to pay "exemplary damages" of Rs one lakh to one of its credit card holders for harassing him by raising an "illegal" demand of Rs 46,490 for a purchase that was never made. The New Delhi … [Continue reading]

Filed Under: Consumer Courts, Court Judgments

Maharashtra State Commission asks insurance firm to pay Rs 49 lakhs to Engineer

August 21, 2012 By Legal Solutions

The Maharashtra State Consumer Commission has asked New India Assurance to pay Rs 49 lakh to a former Air India engineer by August 25, as the Insurance Company had arbitrarily repudiated the insurance claim payable under a policy. The amount includes … [Continue reading]

Filed Under: Court Judgments

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • …
  • 26
  • Next Page »

Recent Comments

  • Mageshwari Dilip on Grievance Officer at Flipkart
  • Bhramar on Grievance Officer at Flipkart
  • Shaik ammu on Grievance Officer at Flipkart
  • Nandakishor on Grievance Officer at Zomato
  • Humera Khan on Grievance Officer at OnePlus India
  • TERRELL L WARDELL on Contact Us
  • Raj Kumar Gangwar on Grievance Officer at MakeMyTrip
  • Prince on Grievance Officer at Yahoo!
  • Natarajan on Grievance Officer at WIPO (World Intellectual Property Organization)
  • Narayana Rao Myneni on Grievance Officer at Amazon India

Copyright © 2026 · Disclaimer · Legal Solutions · Log in